| Volume I |
| CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|
Paragraph |
| Prelim |
| CHAPTER ONE |
| The Murder of Stephen Lawrence |
| CHAPTER TWO |
| Since the Murder |
| CHAPTER THREE |
| The Inquiry |
|
Terms of Reference |
|
3.1 |
|
Limited immunity |
|
3.2 |
|
The Commissioner's intervention 20.4.98 |
|
3.16 |
|
The Advisers |
|
|
3.24 |
|
Counsel and Solicitors |
|
3.26 |
|
The Secretariat |
|
|
3.29 |
| CHAPTER FOUR |
| Mr & Mrs Lawrence and Stephen |
| CHAPTER FIVE |
| Duwayne Brooks |
|
His evidence |
|
|
5.5 |
|
At the scene |
|
|
5.10 |
|
Stereotyped |
|
|
5.12 |
|
At the hospital |
|
|
5.13 |
|
At Plumstead Police Station |
|
5.14 |
|
Liaison |
|
|
5.17 |
|
His prosecution |
|
|
5.27 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
5.30 |
| CHAPTER SIX |
| Racism |
|
Kent Report |
|
|
6.2 |
|
Racism |
|
|
6.4 |
|
Institutional racism |
|
6.6 |
|
Unwitting racism |
|
6.13 |
|
Failure of first investigation |
|
6.21 |
|
The Commissioner's view |
|
6.25 |
|
The MPS Black Police Association's view |
|
6.27 |
|
1990 Trust |
|
|
6.29 |
|
Commission for Racial Equality |
|
6.30 |
|
Dr Robin Oakley |
|
6.31 |
|
Dr Benjamin Bowling |
|
6.33 |
|
The Inquiry's "definition" |
|
6.34 |
|
Professor Simon Holdaway |
|
6.37 |
|
Institutional racism present |
|
6.45 |
|
ACPO view |
|
|
6.49 |
|
Mr Paul Pugh |
|
|
6.58 |
|
The Home Secretary |
|
6.62 |
| CHAPTER SEVEN |
| The Five Suspects |
|
Research |
|
|
7.11 |
|
Other offences |
|
|
7.15 |
|
Witness K |
|
|
7.25 |
|
Witness B |
|
|
7.27 |
|
1994 Surveillance |
|
7.31 |
|
Evidence at the Inquiry |
|
7.39 |
|
Divisional Court ruling |
|
7.40 |
|
Perjury |
|
|
7.43 |
|
'Autrefois acquit' |
|
7.46 |
| CHAPTER EIGHT |
| Corruption and Collusion |
|
The allegation |
|
|
8.2 |
|
Standard of proof |
|
8.5 |
|
The "Norris factor" |
|
8.6 |
|
Sergeant XX |
|
|
8.14 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
8.18 |
| CHAPTER NINE |
| The Stacey Benefield Case |
|
The allegation |
|
|
9.1 |
|
Identification |
|
|
9.5 |
|
The alleged bribe |
|
9.7 |
|
Raymond Dewar's trial |
|
9.12 |
|
David Norris' trial |
|
9.13 |
|
Acquittal of David Norris |
|
9.17 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
9.27 |
| CHAPTER TEN |
| First Aid |
|
Mr & Mrs Taaffe |
|
10.1 |
|
Duwayne Brooks |
|
10.5 |
|
Doctors' opinion |
|
|
10.14 |
|
PC James Geddis & Mrs Geddis |
|
10.15 |
|
PCs Linda Bethel & Anthony Gleason |
|
10.23 |
|
Training inadequate |
|
10.28 |
|
Senior officers present |
|
10.31 |
|
PC Gleason's actions |
|
10.34 |
|
ABC of First Aid |
|
10.35 |
|
PC Joanne Smith |
|
10.39 |
|
Treatment of Duwayne Brooks at scene and hospital |
|
10.43 |
|
Paramedics |
|
|
10.44 |
|
The Avery sisters |
|
10.46 |
|
Inspector Steven Groves |
|
10.47 |
|
The experts: |
Mr Graham Cook |
|
10.52 |
|
|
Mr David Sadler |
|
10.54 |
|
PC Stephen Hughes |
|
10.55 |
|
Conclusions |
|
|
10.56 |
| CHAPTER ELEVEN |
| Initial Response |
|
Lack of command and organisation |
|
11.1 |
|
Lack of documents |
|
11.2 |
|
Inspector Groves' notes |
|
11.3 |
|
TSG carriers |
|
|
11.9 |
|
Mr Groves goes to Welcome Inn |
|
11.12 |
|
Mobile search |
|
|
11.14 |
|
Disarray |
|
|
11.16 |
|
Other TSG vehicles |
|
11.18 |
|
Cordons |
|
|
11.21 |
|
Other senior officers present |
|
11.27 |
|
Absence of logs |
|
|
11.30 |
|
Control non-existent |
|
11.32 |
|
Duwayne Brooks |
|
11.34 |
|
The red Astra car |
|
11.35 |
|
Lack of information |
|
11.45 |
|
Lack of direction and control |
|
11.51 |
|
Summary |
|
|
11.58 |
|
Disagreement with Kent |
|
11.60 |
| CHAPTER TWELVE |
| I |
Arrival at the Scene of Senior Officers |
| II |
The Hospital |
| III |
Arrival of the CID |
|
Chief Inspector Jonathan McIvor |
|
12.2 |
|
Chief Superintendent Christopher Benn |
|
12.18 |
|
Inspector Ian Little |
|
12.33 |
|
THE HOSPITAL |
|
Mr Little arrives |
|
|
12.43 |
|
Words used by Mr Little |
|
12.44 |
|
Visit to resuscitation room for identification |
|
of Stephen Lawrence |
|
12.48 |
|
Further conversation with Mr Lawrence |
|
12.51 |
|
Lack of sensitivity of Mr Little |
|
12.53 |
|
Lack of arrangements for Mr & Mrs Lawrence |
|
12.58 |
|
Unwitting racism |
|
12.60 |
|
Miss Mandy Lavin |
|
12.61 |
|
The CID |
|
DC Steven Pye |
|
|
12.66 |
|
Detective Inspector Philip Jeynes |
|
12.80 |
|
Chief Superintendent John Philpott |
|
12.98 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
12.99 |
| CHAPTER THIRTEEN |
| The First Senior Investigating Officer |
|
Appointment as SIO |
|
13.4 |
|
Main complaint of Mr & Mrs Lawrence |
|
13.7 |
|
Fundamental error |
|
13.9 |
|
Mr Crampton at the scene |
|
13.15 |
|
Appointment of family liaison officers |
|
13.20 |
|
Briefings |
|
|
13.23 |
|
Start of vital information - 23.4.93 |
|
13.24 |
|
Arrival of 'James Grant' - 23.4.93 |
|
13.25 |
|
Second visit of 'James Grant' - 24.4.93 |
|
13.27 |
|
Anonymous letters (Witness FF) |
|
13.29 |
|
Decision not to arrest |
|
13.32 |
|
No record of decision |
|
13.38 |
|
7 May arrests. Words used |
|
13.43 |
|
Search upon arrest for other offence |
|
13.45 |
|
No policy file entry, or apparent examination by senior officers |
13.48 |
|
Handover to Mr Weeden |
|
13.49 |
|
Fundamental misjudgment |
|
13.51 |
|
Clifford Norris |
|
|
13.52 |
|
Lack of connection |
|
13.57 |
|
Sergeant XX |
|
|
13.58 |
|
Mr Crampton's reference |
|
13.60 |
|
Conclusion re Sergeant XX |
|
13.68 |
|
No corruption or collusion |
|
13.72 |
|
Duwayne Brooks |
|
13.76 |
|
Resources |
|
|
13.80 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
13.83 |
|
Post-script as to grounds for arrest |
|
13.84 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
13.92 |
| CHAPTER FOURTEEN |
| The Second Senior Investigating Officer |
| Detective Superintendent Brian Weeden |
|
Handover |
|
|
14.3 |
|
DIO not HOLMES trained |
|
14.5 |
|
Continuation of strategy |
|
14.8 |
|
Arrest on reasonable grounds for suspicion |
|
14.11 |
|
Failure to arrest fundamental |
|
14.18 |
|
Witness K |
|
|
14.20 |
|
Source of James Grant's information |
|
14.22 |
|
Witness B |
|
|
14.24 |
|
Registration of James Grant |
|
14.26 |
|
Mr Weeden's honesty not impugned |
|
14.29 |
|
No racism as to investigation duties |
|
14.30 |
|
Norris connection |
|
14.35 |
|
No conspiracy |
|
|
14.39 |
|
Criticism of surveillance |
|
14.41 |
|
Red Astra car |
|
|
14.44 |
|
Outside pressures as to arrest on 7 May |
|
14.52 |
|
Opinion as to discontinuance |
|
14.54 |
|
Detective Sergeant Christopher Crowley |
|
14.56 |
|
Family Liaison |
|
|
14.59 |
|
Mr Weeden's briefing notes |
|
14.65 |
|
"Bombardment" by letter |
|
14.66 |
|
Failure to deal appropriately with family |
|
14.74 |
|
Unwitting racism |
|
14.74 |
|
Responsibility for failure of liaison |
|
14.76 |
|
Duwayne Brooks |
|
14.77 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
14.86 |
| CHAPTER FIFTEEN |
| Deputy Senior Investigating Officer |
| Detective Inspector Benjamin Bullock |
|
Service |
|
|
15.4 |
|
Ignorance of AMIP guidelines |
|
15.5 |
|
HOLMES |
|
|
15.7 |
|
James Grant |
|
|
15.13 |
|
Clifford Norris |
|
|
15.23 |
|
Norris connection |
|
15.31 |
|
Family liaison |
|
|
15.37 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
15.45 |
| CHAPTER SIXTEEN |
| The Incident Room |
| Detective Sergeant Peter Flook |
|
DS Flook |
|
|
16.1 |
|
Ignorance of job description |
|
16.3 |
|
Multiple roles |
|
|
16.6 |
|
HOLMES inadequately serviced |
|
16.11 |
|
Delay |
|
|
16.16 |
|
Red Astra car |
|
|
16.18 |
|
Cross-examination as to the family |
|
16.22 |
|
Mr Imran Khan |
|
|
16.21 |
|
Lack of control |
|
|
16.26 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
16.28 |
| CHAPTER SEVENTEEN |
| House to House Inquiries |
| CHAPTER EIGHTEEN |
| Surveillance |
|
No plan or record |
|
18.1 |
|
Priority |
|
|
18.4 |
|
Black binliners, 26.4.93 |
|
18.8 |
|
Black binliners, 27.4.93 |
|
18.11 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
18.19 |
| CHAPTER NINETEEN |
| Detective Sergeant John Davidson, and |
| Handling of Certain Witnesses |
|
James Grant |
|
|
19.4 |
|
Detective Sergeant John Davidson |
|
19.8 |
|
Lack of documents |
|
19.10 |
|
James Grant, 27.4.93 |
|
19.14 |
|
James Grant, 6.5.93 |
|
19.16 |
|
Registration of James Grant |
|
19.17 |
|
Witness B |
|
|
19.27 |
|
Arrest and interview of Gary Dobson |
|
19.31 |
|
Detective Sergeant Davidson's views as to motive |
|
19.34 |
|
Unwitting racism |
|
19.37 |
|
Conclusions |
|
|
19.42 |
| CHAPTER TWENTY |
| The Elimination of the Suspects and the red Astra car |
|
Red Astra at scene |
|
20.4 |
|
30.4.93, red Astra car stopped |
|
20.8 |
|
Delay |
|
|
20.9 |
|
Detective Constable Michael Tomlin |
|
20.11 |
|
Conclusions as to Red Astra |
|
20.17 |
|
Examples of other failures |
|
20.18 |
|
Blue Stewart |
|
|
20.19 |
|
Michael Bunn |
|
|
20.20 |
|
Bradley & Scott Lamb |
|
20.21 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
20.23 |
| CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE |
| Identification Parades and Fair Haired Attacker |
|
Dates of parades |
|
|
21.1 |
|
7.5.93 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
13.5.93 |
|
|
21.8 |
|
Neil Acourt |
|
|
21.12 |
|
24.5.93 |
|
|
21.13 |
|
3.6.93 Luke Knight identified |
|
21.14 |
|
Improper control |
|
21.18 |
|
The fair haired attacker |
|
21.22 |
| CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO |
| Details as to 3 June 1993 and |
| Mr Brooks' contact with Detective Sergeant Christopher Crowley |
|
The allegation |
|
|
22.3 |
|
Escort duty. 3.6.93 |
|
22.8 |
|
Date of DS Crowley's statement |
|
22.9 |
|
Mr Brooks' "conversation" |
|
22.16 |
|
Return to Plumstead |
|
22.27 |
|
Central Criminal Court |
|
22.33 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
22.36 |
|
Norris connection |
|
22.37 |
|
Rolan Adams case |
|
22.38 |
|
The allegation |
|
|
22.39 |
|
Mr Cattini |
|
|
22.41 |
|
Alleged robbery |
|
|
22.43 |
|
Statements taken by DS Crowley |
|
22.47 |
|
Mr Macdonald's concession |
|
22.51 |
|
Conclusion |
|
|
22.52
|
|