Table 4.16
Prevalence of self-reported use of tobacco products,
of saliva cotinine of 15 ng/ml or over, and of adjusted tobacco usea,
by minority ethnic groupb
| Aged 16 and over with
a valid saliva cotinine measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
|
| Use of tobacco products,
saliva cotinine level, adjusted smoking prevalence |
Minority ethnic group
|
|
|
|
General
population
(1998)c |
| |
Black |
|
|
|
|
|
| Men |
Caribbean |
Indian |
Pakistani |
Bangladeshi |
Chinese |
Irish |
|
|
| Observed % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Self-reported use of any
tobacco |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| products |
38 |
28 |
28 |
53 |
20 |
44 |
32 |
| Saliva cotinine level 15
ng/ml and over |
40 |
29 |
35 |
55 |
18 |
40 |
32 |
| Adjusted tobacco use prevalence |
43 |
34 |
38 |
59 |
23 |
46 |
36 |
| Extent of under-reporting |
5 |
6 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
| Standardised risk ratios |
| Adjusted smoking prevalence |
1.23 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
1.52 |
0.53 |
1.34 |
1 |
| Standard error |
0.09 |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
|
| Women |
|
| Observed % |
| Self-reported use of any tobacco |
| products |
25 |
8 |
7 |
27 |
9 |
33 |
27 |
| Saliva cotinine level 15
ng/ml and over |
26 |
10 |
10 |
34 |
9 |
33 |
27 |
| Adjusted tobacco use prevalence |
28 |
12 |
12 |
38 |
11 |
35 |
29 |
| Extent of under-reporting |
3 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
| Standardised risk ratios |
| Adjusted smoking prevalence |
0.86 |
0.38 |
0.31 |
1.75 |
0.28 |
1.09 |
1 |
| Standard error |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.12 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
|
|
| Bases (weighted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Men |
188 |
329 |
167 |
46 |
43 |
883 |
c |
| Women |
251 |
298 |
162 |
43 |
53 |
968 |
c |
|
| Bases (unweighted): |
| Men |
270 |
348 |
279 |
179 |
136 |
302 |
5042 |
| Women |
364 |
321 |
278 |
174 |
165 |
351 |
5468 |
|
a Adjusted tobacco use prevalence is the proportion who reported
tobacco product use and/or had saliva cotinine of 15 ng/ml or over.
b An additional weight has been added to correct for response bias in the sub-sample providing a valid saliva sample (see Section 4.5.1).
c Comparative general population data are not
available for saliva cotinine from the 1999 survey itself, comparative
data have therefore been taken from the 1998
survey, in which no weighting was involved.
| We welcome your comments on this site.
|
Prepared 10 January 2001 |
|
|